Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Data tables tutorial: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→"Good" example: expert |
→"Good" example: reply |
||
Line 421:
:::::As for the need of an expert: [[WCAG]] 2.0 consists of 72 A level criteria, 28 AA level criteria and 36 AAA level criteria. And more than 300 techniques are related to them. Perhaps you can read it all in a few days, and understand it perfectly. Which would mean that you are a genius. I'm certainly not capable of that. That's why I need to be in contact with an expert. I'm doing my best, I'm using accurate sources, but I still need an expert to ensure I'm doing the right thing. Hope that makes it clearer. Yours, [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 19:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
::::::I don't think I ever questioned the need for an expert, but it's fair enough for the community to ensure that the "expert" advice is really coming from an "expert". Cheers, [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 19:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
:::::::Fair enough indeed. I can't provide the identity of this expert, but I can provide the identity of the experts I will meet at the accessibility training. Yours, [[User:Dodoïste|Dodoïste]] ([[User talk:Dodoïste|talk]]) 19:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
| |||