Revision as of 04:39, 8 June 2004 edit Sam Spade (talk \| contribs) 33,916 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:39, 8 June 2004 edit undo Sam Spade (talk \| contribs) 33,916 edits →arguments Next edit →
Line 1: There are many '''arguments against the existence of God''' which have been proposed over time, often referring to a classical [[bible\|Biblical]] view of [[God]], in which God is anthropomorphic, and/or a view of God in which God is portrayed as omniscient, omnipotent and omni-benevolent (all-good). == General arguments == * [[Occam's Razor\|Argument by Occam's Razor]]▼ * [[Argument from evolution]]▼ == Arguments by contradiction == Line 23 ⟶ 28: * The utilitarian argument, a variant of [[Pascal's wager]] using different starting assumptions: it is safer to bet on unbelief, than belief in the wrong god and risk eternal damnation for worshipping an idol. * [[Argument from pain and pleasure]]. ▲* [[Occam's Razor\|Argument by Occam's Razor]] ▲* [[Argument from evolution]] == Are arguments against the existence of God necessary? ==

Arguments against the existence of God: Difference between revisions