Talk:Jahbulon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Vandalism
SeraphimXI (talk | contribs)
Line 236:
This is what's up:
#''"The word "Jahbulon" throughout history"'' throughout what history?!? ''All Masonic history?!?''' Your oldest cite is 1875. That's a couple breaths in Masonry's history. The statement is simply wrong.
:History is a generic term, that just means through the past, I'll change it to since 1875. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 
#''"Anti-Masonic religious groups:"'' who are...??????????????
: Any religious group that is anti-masonic... it's impossible to make a complete list of them and not include a false positive or omit a group. The correct label is "Anti-Masonic religious groups".<font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
#''"a Masonic "God".'' in those people's definition of god, that could be true, but for the rest of the sane world, no.
: I took that quote from TLEM, that is stating what they believe that is all. It does not matter if they are sane or not, it is what they believe, and that is how it's being used.<font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
#''"Masonic antiquarians"'' who are ...........? What, all of 'em? & if you say "TLEM" again....... I'll sneeze. & I hate sneexing...'' ''';~D''' ''
: I took that line from the entymology in the old version of the article. I'll change it to "some Masonic antiquarians". <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
#''"Some religious groups"'' which are..........? & who cares anyway? Is this a dictionary about the beliefs of some specific religious groups? Yup, sure is, so '''go write up their article & put that quote there'''
:As I said earlier it is impossible to create a comprehensive list, therefore the word some is the only way to cover it. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
#The citations are all over the place. This being the 3+ times you've been asked to cite properly, or even close to properly, I'll say this: "At this point, learn. Then edit."
:If you would point out what I am doing incorrectly i'll gladly fix it. I'll change it to fit the standard reference methods. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
#Your little diatribe devolves into a mini-article of Freemasonry...
:No it's about the word only, and some of the contravercy around the word which is all centered on freemasonry. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
::Of which you seem to know an aweful lot about... Anyone else... see... anything?
:[[User:Grye|Grye]] 02:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
::: If you want to accuse me of being a sockpuppet please put up a checkuser request with any "evidence" you have so I can be cleared. Posting snide comments is not the appropriate way of doing this. <font color="FF3399">[[User:SeraphimXI|Seraphim]]</font> 02:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)