::I agree and I've reverted the changes. It's not acceptable to have sections that are obviously incomplete and written as such. [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 04:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Sorry! Will draft the complete article offline first. The article is in desperate need of revision. It contains inaccuracies, blatant advertising (Rosetta Stone) and is not a reflection of the current state of CALL. Looking at the individual sections once again, I think it is possible to correct them and tidy them up one by one, without making a mess of the article as a whole. I'll make a few changes today, starting with the Introduction and History sections. The Introduction in particular is poorly written and needs simplifying. I think that the section on problems and criticisms is one that should be targeted for total revision. It's too slanted. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ([[WikipediaUser talk:SignaturesGroovyGuzi|undatedtalk]]) comment added 0810:4749, 26 November 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Looking at the individual sections once again, I think it is possible to correct them and tidy them up one by one, without making a mess of the article as a whole. I'll make a few changes today, starting with the Introduction and History sections. The Introduction in particular is poorly written and needs simplifying. I think that the section on problems and criticisms is one that should be targeted for total revision. It's too slanted. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] ([[User talk:GroovyGuzi|talk]]) 10:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
