Content deleted Content added
Raymond Hill (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 335:
*In going on with "Basic Concepts", at no point in it has any editor who knows Dianetics been allowed to post what Dianetics is all about, Spirit of Man and my edits are constantly reverted, people post up excuses like "POV!", reverting. etc. Very very little discussion is done about those sorts of edits, but they prevent the subject from being introduced in an understandable way.[[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 20:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
*Under "Scientific Evaluations, the first line presents that Hubbard's idea had some connection to Freud (Hubbard has credited Freud, but been specific about his credit). The article's credit to Freud cites an entire chapter of Freud's work and makes no mention of what specific area Hubbard found Freud's work to be helpful about.
Hmm, somehow my signature was removed from my discussion, I sign again. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 18:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
:* I'm sure this can be clarified in the article. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] 19:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
::*Again you ignore the point I am stating. Choose any 6 word phrase, as you did in the article. That was, "with an accompanying expression of emotion." and then quote an enormous book (Freud's complete works) and the reader is to find that phrase in that book? That isn't right, that isn't good editing, that is wrong, that is not per [[WP:CITE]]. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 20:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
| |||