Talk:Computer-assisted language learning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:15, 27 November 2010

Revision as of 18:22, 27 November 2010

Line 40:

::I agree and I've reverted the changes. It's not acceptable to have sections that are obviously incomplete and written as such. [[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] ([[User talk:ElKevbo|talk]]) 04:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry! Will draft the complete article offline. The article is in desperate need of revision. It contains inaccuracies, blatant advertising (Rosetta Stone) and is not a reflection of the current state of CALL. Looking at the individual sections once again, I think it is possible to correct them and tidy them up one by one, without making a mess of the article as a whole. I'll make a few changes today, starting with the Introduction and History sections. The Introduction in particular is poorly written and needs simplifying. I think that the section on problems and criticisms is one that should be targeted for total revision. It's too slanted. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] ([[User talk:GroovyGuzi|talk]]) 10:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Advertisement for the Rosetta Stone removed. There are many more CALL programs that could have been mentioned. Better not to list any commercial products, I think, unless cited as an example of a particular ''type'' of program, e.g. Sim City and Montevidisco. [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] ([[User talk:GroovyGuzi|talk]]) 11:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)