Revision as of 07:58, 29 November 2010 edit Useerup (talk \| contribs) 1,268 edits →Value types (again) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:19, 5 December 2010 edit undo Deltafox1229 (talk \| contribs) 2 edits →Possible Fallacy in Feature comparison: new section Next edit →
Line 359: </source> ::As you can see, zem2 is ''copied'' from zem1, but their "questions" clearly refer to different objects. If they had been copied by reference there would be only one question. [[User:Useerup\|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup\|talk]]) 07:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC) == Possible Fallacy in Feature comparison == I am referencing [[Comparison of C Sharp and Java#Feature comparison\|this section]], under the heading "Object Orientation". I believe that Java includes event handling in the majority of it's implementations. All classes implementing <tt>java.util.EventListener</tt>[http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/EventListener.html] are able to process events, and all classes extending <tt>java.util.EventObject</tt>[http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/EventObject.html] are objects containing the details of the event. These features have been in effect since JDK 1.1 [[User:Deltafox1229\|Deltafox1229]] ([[User talk:Deltafox1229\|talk]]) 00:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions