Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:54, 5 December 2010

Revision as of 15:18, 5 December 2010

Line 369:

:: Java has not just event's handling by convention. For example, all AWT and components event's are hard-wired to Java events at a very low level of the JVM / Java library. You do not have to do any specific wiring to use them. It's different for the Observer pattern IMO, because it is just a pattern that you can or not choose to use. Events are there, you can't say in java (or it will be incredibly hard), no I will use another way to handle events that what Java already has. same as for C#. [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] ([[User talk:Hervegirod|talk]]) 13:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

:::AWT is not part of Java. AWT is built upon Java (the language). The hard-wiring you refer to is the AWT components using JNI. That does ''not'' make AWT or events part of ''the Java programming language'' [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 13:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

:::: Ahem you can't have Java without AWT. All widgets events handling is done per AWT, at the core Java platform level. Whether you use AWT or another graphic toolkit. [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] ([[User talk:Hervegirod|talk]]) 15:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)