Revision as of 15:47, 18 February 2006 edit Chris Page (talk \| contribs) 64 edits Hardware optimized for strict languages? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:36, 18 February 2006 edit undo TuukkaH (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,558 edits →Hardware optimized for strict languages?: ponder Next edit →
Line 7: "All hardware architectures in common use are optimized for strict languages, so the best compilers for non-strict languages produce slower code than the best compilers for strict languages." Is there a reference for this? In what way are common hardware architectures optimized for strict languages? — [[User:Chris Page\|Chris Page]] 15:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC) :Hmm, I've heard it in the form that all machine architectures would be optimized for C, which of course is a strict language. It could be easier to find references for what common hardware is missing from the lazy language point of view. --[[User:TuukkaH\|TuukkaH]] 16:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Strict programming language: Difference between revisions