Content deleted Content added
add maths rating template and header for old talk |
|||
Line 25:
Hrafn, I challenge you to find ''one'' thing from algebra in the article. — [[User:Kallikanzarid|Kallikanzarid]]<sup>[[User talk:Kallikanzarid|talk]]</sup> 18:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
It doesn't read like a textbook, it reads like an encyclopedia article on a mathematical subject, indeed it doesn't try to teach the subject, but presents it, as it should. This article, on a notable mathematical subject, is entirely approppriate, and looks similar to thousands of other math articles (just click on some of the links in the article, e.g. [[Convex function]]). This is not the place to argue for a change in inclusion criteria for scientific/technical articles. Editors try to make articles as accessible as possible, but it can't be done at the expense of a proper encyclopedic presentation of the subject, which demands to faithfully render what the sources say (per [[WP:V]] and [[WP:NOR]]), so imposes a minimum of rigor, symbols and jargon. [[User:Cenarium|Cenarium]] ([[User talk:Cenarium|talk]]) 22:31, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
== Unicode symbols ==
| |||