Revision as of 03:53, 27 December 2010 edit Pnm (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 14,752 edits Reorganize and clean up remaining content. Remove essay-like and wikify. Place inline cleanup messages. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:04, 27 December 2010 edit undo Pnm (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 14,752 edits Remove almost irrelevant detail on Flash security, replace with See also to the section. Performance section is lopsided, tag NPOV. Next edit →
Line 33: === Performance === {{pov-section\|date=December 2010}} Flash is known for its high [[CPU time\|CPU usage]].<ref>"Flash - CPU Usage - FPS - Frame Rate." Online posting. 10 Dec 2008. Reader discussions, Adobe Support Forums. 10 Dec 2010. http://forums.adobe.com/thread/230334</ref>{{verify credibility\|date=December 2010}} ~~=== Security risk ===~~ {{further\|[[Adobe Flash#Security\|Adobe Flash security]]}}▼ A Flash [[exploit (computer security)\|exploit]] was able to steal passwords for the video game ''[[World of Warcraft]]''.<ref>"Flash exploit used to steal gaming passwords." Virus Bulletin. 29 May 2008. Web. 10 Dec 2010. http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2008/05_29.xml?rss</ref> == Apple == Line 63 ⟶ 58: In September 2010, Apple eased its restrictions by allowing deployment of Flash applications on [[iOS (Apple)\|iOS]] by using [[Adobe Packager]].<ref>Sorrel, Charlie. "Apple Eases App Development Rules, Adobe Surges." Wired. Wired, 2010. Web. 12 Sept. 2010.</ref> According to Adobe Labs, Adobe Packager “offers Flash developers a fast and efficient method to reuse existing code from ActionScript 3 projects to deliver native applications on iOS devices”.{{citequote\|date=December 2010}} == See also == ▲~~{{further\|~~* [[Adobe Flash#Security\|Adobe Flash security]]}} ==References==

Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Difference between revisions