Content deleted Content added
Line 456:
: Maybe cite uri would be better than cite web? --[[User:BACbKA|BACbKA]] 13:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
::Also, it would be nice if before we move, we discuss some field name changes, such as ''date'' and ''year'' to ''accessdate'' and ''accessyear'' (easier to understand their use), and likewise ''publishyear'' to ''year''. This won't be hard to do with [[WP:AWB|AWB]] as part of the move, right? [[User:Gracefool|··gracefool]] |[[User talk:gracefool|☺]] 13:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
:::Simple parameter renames are no problem. Of yourse I agree dicussing first. I've added a warning text to {{tl|cite web}} so that it's not used prematurely. We should also wait putting the deprecated tag here until there is consensus what to do exactly. This went wrong on book ref last time. --[[User:Adrian Buehlmann|Adrian Buehlmann]] 13:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
| |||