Revision as of 20:33, 19 January 2011 edit Nageh (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 6,862 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:37, 19 January 2011 edit undo Nageh (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 6,862 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 19: :Well, we'll have to agree to disagree on that point. In my opinion our coverage of computing contains many articles that are of no use whatsoever to a general audience and are more like a directory of obscure terminology than encyclopedic content. This article being an example of such. [[User:Beeblebrox\|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox\|talk]]) 20:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC) ::Great. Another person who thinks to know what is useful for a general audience. Wikipedia, an encyclopedia for everyone. :( [[User:Nageh\|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh\|talk]]) 20:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC) ::PS: Read the lengthy discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:Scientific_citation_guidelines/Archive_2#Pillar_one_reminder]] including the section before and after it at the current [[Wikipedia_talk:Scientific_citation_guidelines\|discussion page]]. Thanks for your consideration. [[User:Nageh\|Nageh]] ([[User talk:Nageh\|talk]]) 20:37, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failure-oblivious computing: Difference between revisions