Content deleted Content added
Line 370:
Don't you feel some personal responsibility for the mistake you made a year ago? When grown adults do something wrong, they admit their error, apologize, and try to make amends. I feel you see that an error was made but aren't really trying to fix it (much less say, "I was wrong"). By keeping the primary restriction on me you are in fact basically doing nothing. [[User:VeryVerily|Very]]<font color="green">[[User talk:VeryVerily|Verily]]</font> 19:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
:I admit the possibliity that sections of our decision may have been flawed. On the other hand, I find it galling that you could give us an evidence page [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily/Evidence|that looks like this]] and then dare to complain that we made mistakes. (Nor, after looking at that page again, should it be surprising if perchance we did) Furthermore, when asked during this arbitration case to answer exactly one very simple question (to provide evidence linking Ruy Lopez to his sockpuppets), you decided to do the *exact same thing* as in the previous case, and pointed to another 50 kb of non-evidence. (You should probably thank TDC for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VeryVerily&diff=prev&oldid=38465830 doing your job for you]) If you can't be bothered to put together a coherent presentation of your case, then you have only yourself to blame if the case doesn't go your way.
:As far as the requirement that you discuss all reverts - all the other evidence misbehavior aside, the titanic edit wars you engaged in justify it by themselves. ([[Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars ever|WP:Lame]] should have a section dedicated especially to you and 172, for your multiple 100+ revert wars) The reason I wrote the remedy lifting the 1RR injuntion on you is that I think the 3RR adaquently does the job. [[User:Raul654|Raul654]] 19:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
| |||