Revision as of 10:18, 24 January 2011 edit Gronky (talk \| contribs) 12,157 edits I think this is nothing but a marketing term masquerading as a topic. The amount of descriptive test without references reinforces my thinking. ~~~~ ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:51, 24 January 2011 edit undo Gronky (talk \| contribs) 12,157 edits →I'm dubious. Does this topic really exist?: This article shouldn't be about the label, it should be about the concept, which is "tasks (language learning tool)". ~~~~ Next edit →
Line 9: Yep, I think this is nothing but a marketing term masquerading as a topic. The amount of descriptive test without references reinforces my thinking. [[User:Gronky\|Gronky]] ([[User talk:Gronky\|talk]]) 10:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC) UPDATE: I guess there's a topic "tasks (language learning tool)", and some methods are more task-based than others. No method is 100% or 0% task-based (just as no method is 100% or 0% grammar-based). A method that focusses a lot on tasks could be called "task-based", but it's just a label. This article shouldn't be about the label, it should be about the concept, which is "tasks (language learning tool)". [[User:Gronky\|Gronky]] ([[User talk:Gronky\|talk]]) 10:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Task-based language teaching: Difference between revisions