Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:10, 25 January 2011

Revision as of 21:22, 25 January 2011

Line 237:

Following my opening the Request for Arbitration, responses were made by the above editors; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&action=historysubmit&diff=407941319&oldid=407935442 Moonraker2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&action=historysubmit&diff=407956607&oldid=407955784 NinaGreen], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&action=historysubmit&diff=408050703&oldid=408038237 Warshy]. Rather than arguing for the acceptance of the case, and suggesting other areas of concern, each editor questioned the substance and emphasis of my initial Request statement. Although it is recognised that none of the editors are familiar with the ArbCom procedures it is apparent that not one reviewed the guides and help pages relating to responding to Requests for Arbitration.<br>

Following acceptance of the case NinaGreen, via proxy, then submitted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NinaGreen&diff=prev&oldid=408312276 her case for having the Request dismissed], disregarding the actuality of the matter. Again, this is strongly indicative of an editor acting without making themselves familiar with the situation. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 21:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

==={Write your assertion here}===

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.

==Evidence presented by Xover==