Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Note on MoreThings' evidence |
|||
Line 576:
However, as I said in my Request statement, a ban of NinaGreen is not the main matter before the committee; the future fate of the Shakespeare articles is. These pages should be the jewels in the English Wikipedia's crown, which is impossible if they're produced on a battlefield where every word is contested by aggressive SPAs who live only for seeing their favoured authorship theory receive Justice. We need a solution that sticks. If the Climate Change sanctions are working well, perhaps something like that? [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 23:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC).
:'''Note on MoreThings' evidence, section [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare_authorship_question/Evidence&oldid=410042540#Cauldron_Bubble Cauldron Bubble]'''. I'm aware that NinaGreen, Warshy, Moonraker2, and MoreThings dislike my use of the term "Nina's helpers", but I don't know what else to say. I need a way to refer to people who chime in on her talkpage to support her, but they seem to take me to refer to some [[Real life|RL]] friendship/conspiracy or other skulduggery ("[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare_authorship_question/Evidence&oldid=410042540#Cauldron_Bubble cahoots]"). [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NinaGreen&oldid=408653174#Bishonen.27s_Biased_Statement_On_The_Arbitration_Page_and_LessHeard.27s_Mistaken_Assumption_In_The_Arbitration_Request] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare_authorship_question/Evidence&oldid=408674389#Arbitration_as_it_stands_should_be_dismissed] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NinaGreen&diff=408085005&oldid=408081568][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=408014995][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NinaGreen&diff=408097907&oldid=408085005][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NinaGreen&diff=408101068&oldid=408097907] That's to me so far-fetched that it leaves me with no idea what word they would prefer. I tried to find a neutral term, and lit on the admittedly rather inelegant "helper", which I thought inoffensive and as free as possible of any associations at all; but they're as outraged as if I'd said "Nina's hired guns". Please just tell me what word you'd like me to use: heroes? hajduks? samurai? Give me a term and I'll use it. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 23:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC).
==Evidence presented by Jimbo Wales==
| |||