Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 694:
This is a series of reckless inventions. I objected to it, and the conversation is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare_authorship_question#Statement_by_Moonraker2 here]. Such fantasies by an admin are unacceptable. In my view, Bishonen is enraged by any opposition to her own unreasonable behaviour. Until this ArbCom case, I did not know the history of conflict between Stratfordians and Oxfordians which lay behind the hostility of several established users to Oxfordians, whether real or imagined, but now that it has been explained it seems to me to be based on little more than an [[association fallacy]]. The most courteous users are unsettled by a [[irresistible force paradox|brick wall]], and it cannot be in Wikipedia's best interests to allow one side of any debate to institutionalize the denigration of the other.
With pages like these, and in a medium such as the English Wikipedia, some conflict is inevitable, and grown-up ways need to be found to manage it impartially.
[[User:Moonraker2|Moonraker2]] ([[User talk:Moonraker2|talk]]) 08:
==Evidence presented by {your user name}==
| |||