Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Smatprt's "outing" charge: not really worth rebutting |
→Evidence presented by Fut.Perf.: +more on Zweigenbaum |
||
Line 235:
Notification: as an uninvolved administrator, I have just blocked {{user|Zweigenbaum}} and his IP {{ipuser|98.207.240.11}} for 48hrs for revert-warring (
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&action=historysubmit&diff=407938415&oldid=407921383][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&action=historysubmit&diff=407978349&oldid=407965726][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=408354102&oldid=408330757][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=408374390&oldid=408360053][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=408529842&oldid=408399263]). (Note that the logged-out editing appears to be due to technical problems and was not an attempt at sockpuppetry.)
===Zweigenbaum soapboxing===
Even during these proceedings, {{user|Zweigenbaum}} ({{ipuser|98.207.240.11}}) persistently misuses the SAQ talkpage for soapboxing, engaging in long-winded debates in favour of the merits of the "anti-Stratfordian" case [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=410332776&oldid=410329110]. He explicitly presses for Wikipedia coverage ''not'' to reflect the state of the art found in relevant scholarship, because he considers that scholarship flawed ("''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=410329110&oldid=410325432 this webpage does not benefit from delimiting means of understanding the topic, simply because the Shakespeare field has made that mistake. ... it may be miles ahead of the field it reflects, if it shows a circumstantial argument can be credible]''").
===Charles Darnay blocked indef===
{{user|Charles Darnay}}, a relatively new single-purpose account, was blocked indefinitely for a pattern of aggressive ad hominem postings, and had his talk page access revoked by LessHeard vanU. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charles_Darnay&diff=408463621&oldid=408458024]. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 14:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
| |||