Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:42, 28 January 2011

Revision as of 16:27, 28 January 2011

Line 158:

===How to get around those pesky and unfair Wikipedia policies and actions — a primer for fringe editors===

1. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oxfordian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship&diff=prev&oldid=302480217 7/16/2009] Smatprt createdcreates a newan Oxfordian article.

2. On 3/24/2010 the, article [[Oxfordian theory: Parallels with Shakespeare’s plays]] was deleted as a result of this afd: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxfordian theory: Parallels with Shakespeare's plays]] because of "Inherent violation of [[WP:NPOV]]: extreme undue weight given to a fringe theory."

3. That same day Smatprt [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oxfordian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship&diff=prev&oldid=351725450 mergedmerges the entire article] back in withinto the Oxfordian article "as per talk at merge discussion". Huh??? WhenAn AfD is an AfD a "merge discussion"?

4. On 6/18/2010 he [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AShakespeare_authorship_question%2Fsandbox_3&action=historysubmit&diff=368709587&oldid=368708950 movedmoves the material] intoto another SAQa sandbox article.

5. On 9/9/2010, after being laundered through the sandbox, he then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oxfordian_Theory_-_Parallels_with_Shakespeare%27s_Plays&oldid=383757496 forkedforks the materialit] into a new article, [[Oxfordian Theory - Parallels with Shakespeare's Plays]], replacedreplaces the colon with a dash, addedadds two grafs of disclaimer for "NPOV" purposesdisclaimer and 17 external links to Oxfordian Web siteslinks.

6. He then again [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oxfordian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship&action=historysubmit&diff=383967018&oldid=383732090 deletes the material from the main article] and links the two.

''Voilà!'' PatienceWikipedia pays off handsomely! No muss, no fuss, all the admins and editors are all looking elsewhere, andhosts virtually the exact same article is now on Wikipedia! So much for WP process.

==Evidence presented by Becritical ==