Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:27, 28 January 2011

Revision as of 16:29, 28 January 2011

Line 137:

'''[[User:Ironhand41|Ironhand41]]''' self-identified as Earl Showerman (presumably president of the [[Shakespeare Fellowship]]: "The purpose of the Shakespeare Fellowship is to promote public awareness and acceptance of the authorship of the Shakespeare Canon by Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford (1550-1604)"). [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ironhand41 12/16/2010] Account with two edits, one supporting Nina's charges of NPOV at the SAQ peer review.

'''[[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]]''' is an excellent editor with more than 71,000 edits, mostly in opera and musical theatre. He only appears at Shakespeare authorship articles and talk pages when [[User:Smatprt|Smatprt]] needs support. Excepting minor edits, his substantive contributions to the SAQ topic show a pattern of following Smatprt’s lead.

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive121#User:Tom_Reedy_reported_by_User:Ssilvers_.28Result:_Final_warnings.29 1/24/2010]: [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] reported [[User:Tom Reedy|Tom Reedy]] for 3rr violations after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tom_Reedy&diff=prev&oldid=339767482 Smatprt warning]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=355637715 4/12/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=355758669 13 Apr 2010], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=355758323 4/13/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=344052296 2/14/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=356206929 4/15/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=344538168 2/172010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=382347974 9/1/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=382345257 9/1/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:William_Shakespeare&diff=prev&oldid=382344430 9/1/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Oxfordian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship&diff=next&oldid=390068829 10/11/2010].

'''[[User:Bertaut|Bertaut]]''' is another excellent editor with more than 1,100 edits, many that greatly improved Shakespeare articles. He evinces little interest in the SAQ topic unless Smatprt needs support. (I believe both Ssilvers and Bertaut thought they were only doing a friend a favour.)

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=355831390 13 April 2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=355994958 4/14/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=356204087 4/15/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chronology_of_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=356291579 4/16/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_revisionism&action=historysubmit&diff=363047546&oldid=363041657 5/19/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historical_revisionism&diff=prev&oldid=363218998 5/20/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=386207371 9/22/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Shakespeare&diff=prev&oldid=404920138 12/30/2010].

Line 149:

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brief_Chronicles&diff=prev&oldid=347606808 3/3/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=350023036 3/15/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oxfordian_theory:_Parallels_with_Shakespeare%27s_plays&diff=prev&oldid=350441143 3/17/2010].

[[User:Schoenbaum|Schoenbaum]] is an Oxfordian editor with 88 edits, only four on an article page, three of those reversions. The rest of his edits were votes and talk page support for Smatprt.

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=341833485 2/4/2010];

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=344852827 2/18/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=345614926 2/22/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=346552052 2/26/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=347965844 3/5/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=349882629 3/14/2010 (two more like this on same day)]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=350036122 3/15/2010]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=389775509 10/9/2010].

[[User:Xover|Xover]] has listed othermore SPA voter accounts below, sowhich I won't duplicate them.

===How to get around those pesky and unfair Wikipedia policies and actions — a primer for fringe editors===