Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:04, 30 January 2011

Revision as of 06:05, 30 January 2011

Line 709:

===Self-indictment, with a few clumsy sobstory excuses.===

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#Arbcom_submission_here.2C_since_it_is_far_too_long.2C_and_I_am_far_too_exhausted_to_waste_my_last_weeks_on_vacation_reading_thousands_of_diffs I've placed my evidence, also against myself, on my own talk page here] since, despite struggling for a week, I cannot bring myself to do what is required of me, and mount a case against anyone. I prefer to just give the thinnest of sketches as to how I perceived things over the past 11 months. I apologize to arbitration. My knowledge of rules, my grasp of diff theory, everything on wikipedia, is empirical, and in my experience one very rarely gets a comprehensive picture offrom diffs, unless someone is willing to riff back and forward for context, or read whole archives, which would be a form of cruelty here.[[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 06:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

==Evidence presented by {your user name}==