Reproducing kernel Hilbert space: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
A5 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Rv. Claim made about finite set X in previous edit is wrong. Nowhere does it say H consists of all functions on X
Line 7:
:<math> f \mapsto f(x) </math>
 
from ''H'' to the complex numbers is continuous for any ''x'' in ''X''. By the [[Riesz representation theorem]], this implies that for given ''x'' there exists an element ''K''<sub>''x''</sub> of ''H'' withsuch thethat propertyfor that:every function ''f'' in the space,
 
:<math> f(x) = \langle K_x, f \rangle. \quad \forall f \in H \quad (*)</math>
 
The function
 
:<math> K(x,y) \equiv= K_x(y) </math>
 
is called a reproducing kernel for the Hilbert space. In fact, ''K'' is uniquely determined by the above condition (*). In some concrete contexts this amounts to saying
 
:<math>f(x)=\int_Xint_\Omega K(x,y) f(y)\,dy</math>
When ''X'' is finite, then a complex-valued function on ''X'' can be represented as an array of complex numbers. If the usual inner product is used, then ''K''<sub>''x''</sub> is the function whose value is 1 at ''x'' and 0 everywhere else.
 
for every ''f'', where ''X''&Omega; is the appropriate ___domain, often the real numbers or '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>.
In other contexts, (*) amounts to saying
 
:<math>f(x)=\int_X K(x,y) f(y)\,dy</math>
 
for every ''f'', where ''X'' is often the real numbers or '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>.
 
==Bergman kernel==