Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 728:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishidani#Arbcom_submission_here.2C_since_it_is_far_too_long.2C_and_I_am_far_too_exhausted_to_waste_my_last_weeks_on_vacation_reading_thousands_of_diffs I've placed my evidence, also against myself, on my own talk page here] since, despite struggling for a week, I cannot bring myself to do what is required of me, and mount a case against anyone. I prefer to just give the thinnest of sketches as to how I perceived things over the past 11 months. I apologize to arbitration. My knowledge of rules, my grasp of diff theory, everything on wikipedia, is empirical, and in my experience one very rarely gets a comprehensive picture from diffs, unless someone is willing to riff back and forward for context, or read whole archives, which would be a form of cruelty here. I should add, though it is a partisan, subjective comment, that the attempt here to make us into an indistinguishable POV tagteaming duo is unfair to Tom Reedy. He thoroughly revised my 900+edit version of the article, invariably with a severe eye on [[WP:NPOV]], as befits his professional training, and he even went at times out of pocket to purchase and send me rare books on the subject so I could form my own independent idea of some recondite aspects of the field. He is a passionate Shakespearean scholar with however a broad and deep knowledge of that period, yes, but, despite a lapse or two, deserves nothing like the halo of suspicious thrown about him repeatedly, by virtue of his editorial association with me, over the past several months. [[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 06:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Wilde,_1st_Baron_Penzance&diff=412203670&oldid=392678702 This recent edit on an otherwise obscure page] today is a timely reminder that provocative IPs are a problem, and that the potential range for advocating SAQ material over a very large number of articles not related to Shakespeare still exists.[[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 04:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
::For the record [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Wilde,_1st_Baron_Penzance&diff=next&oldid=335622626 I only made one edit to that page], and it has nothing to do with the complaint made in the edit summary given above.[[User:Nishidani|Nishidani]] ([[User talk:Nishidani|talk]]) 04:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
==Evidence presented by jdkag==
| |||