Talk:Neural coding: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:32, 7 February 2011

Revision as of 05:35, 7 February 2011

Line 40:

:The content has been re-inserted. I have restored to status quo ante. Looie496 is right. This is not a comment on the merit of the theory. Wikipedia's [[WP:RS|sourcing policy]], particularly when applied to biomedical articles (see [[WP:MEDRS|this guideline]]), insists that new thought may be included only when it has been evaluated by uninvolved experts in peer-reviewed journals or university-level textbooks, and when its inclusion will not give it undue weight (see [[WP:UNDUE|this fundamental policy]]).

:If you make a change to an article, and it is reverted, polite practice here (per [[WP:BRD|this guidelineessay]]) is to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. Please feel free to discuss this matter here, but the discussion will revolve around those policies I've linked to, not the merits or nature of the theory. --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]]) 05:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)