Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Archive/Feb 2011: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
DyceBot (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 0 stale sections and 6 resolved sections.
DyceBot (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 0 stale sections and 2 resolved sections.
Line 255:
 
:Thank you! [[User:Quigley|Quigley]] ([[User talk:Quigley|talk]]) 20:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
== "Blackie" ==
 
{{resolved}}
<center><gallery>
File:CWR Blackie (0-4-2T).JPG|Cape Town-Wellington Railway 9 (0-4-2WT)
</gallery></center>
'''Article(s):''' [[South African "Blackie" 0-4-2WT]]
'''Request:''' Please remove the embedded text, if possible<br>André Kritzinger 02:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
'''Graphist opinion(s):'''
<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:
{{I take|name}}: when you accept the request ;
when the request is done. -->
 
{{Done}}: Done as requested. [[User:PawełMM|PawełMM]] ([[User talk:PawełMM|talk]]) 11:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
::Perfect, thank you! André Kritzinger 13:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
== Mir node interior ==
{{resolved}}
<!-- nothing or {{resolved}} or {{Stale|user}} -->
<center><gallery>
File:Mir node interior STS-84.jpg|A view of the interior of the [[Mir Core Module]]'s docking node.
File:Mir node interior STS-84, 2.jpg|Version from ''Life''
</gallery></center>
'''Article(s):''' [[Mir]]
'''Request:''' '''Watermark removal''' Hi folks! I've got this image of the interior of ''Mir'', which was taken on [[STS-84]] and as such is a NASA public ___domain image. Unfortunately, as NASA isn't exactly hot at updating its pages about old missions, it's not very high-res. There's a higher-res version of this on the ''Life'' website [http://www.gstatic.com/hostedimg/a162f11d307f233a_large here], but unfortunately it's got a watermark on it (it's printed in Hall, R. editor. The History of Mir 1986-2000. London: British Interplanetary Society; 2000 without the watermark). If someone could please download a copy of the ''Life'' image, remove the watermark and upload it over the lower res image, I'd be very grateful. Thanks in advance, [[User:Colds7ream|Colds7ream]] ([[User talk:Colds7ream|talk]]) 14:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
'''Graphist opinion(s):'''
:{{done}} Removed the watermark and uploaded it as a new image (besides being higher-resolution, I don't find the ''Life'' image to be that much better). —[[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik|talk]]) 16:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
::Thanks very much - why didn't you just upload it over the old image, though? :-S [[User:Colds7ream|Colds7ream]] ([[User talk:Colds7ream|talk]]) 17:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
:::Sorry for not adhering to your request. IMHO the ''Life'' version, while being higher-resolution, is somewhat blurry and not that much clearer. Also, its color balance and contrast look much weaker to me. So I would use the NASA version in an article (where it is downscaled anyway), but keep the ''Life'' version as a larger alternative. —[[User:Quibik|Quibik]] ([[User talk:Quibik|talk]]) 18:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
::::Fair enough! Thanks again for sorting this out! :-) [[User:Colds7ream|Colds7ream]] ([[User talk:Colds7ream|talk]]) 18:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
<!-- This area is for wikigraphists:
{{I take|name}}: when you accept the request ;
{{Done}}: when the request is done. -->
:FYI I have a tool for automatically removing the LIFE watermark with little to no damage - contact me if you ever need this. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 03:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)