Talk:Neural coding: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:06, 7 February 2011

Revision as of 18:51, 7 February 2011

Line 46:

::I appreciate the good faith efforts of the new editor who added the material, but I have to agree with Looie and Anthony. I also think that these concerns apply to the linked page, which is referenced entirely to the research of a single laboratory group. In the talk section above, I raised the idea of merging numerous pages, and I have to admit that I am hugely slow in getting around to acting upon it, but I think that [[NeuroElectroDynamics]] should be included in the merge as well, albeit only as a brief mention here, and mainly to make the other page a redirect. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 15:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Additionally,::I therefeel that authors of NeuroElectroDynamics are manyright. 'piecesHow ofis work'temporal information thatstored canin bethe referenced,brain? In order to replicate their publishedmeasurements papersone inhas peerto reviewedperform journalsinvivo experiments and to insert four electrodes close to the IOScell. bookMany asrecordings requireduse (see [[WP:UNDUE|thissingle fundamentalelectrodes. policy]])The mathematical model is one thing, their experiment shows patterns in spikes. I agree that the entire paragraph can be altered; however it should not be entirely deleted <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Goodwillein|Goodwillein]] ([[User talk:Goodwillein|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Goodwillein|contribs]]) 1817:0314, 7 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::

I feel that authors of::Additionally, NeuroElectroDynamicsthere are right.many How'pieces isof temporalwork' information storedthat incan thebe brain? In order to replicatereferenced, their measurementspublished onepapers has toin performpeer invivoreviewed experimentsjournals and to insert four electrodes close to the cell.IOS Manybook recordingsas userequired (see single[[WP:UNDUE|this electrodes.fundamental The mathematical model is one thing, their experiment shows patterns in spikespolicy]]). I agree that the entire paragraph can be altered; however it should not be entirely deleted <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Goodwillein|Goodwillein]] ([[User talk:Goodwillein|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Goodwillein|contribs]]) 1718:1403, 7 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:::Concerning peer-reviewed publications, I find only a few papers in minor journals such as Neural Processing Letters and BMC Neuroscience, and even those have not been cited by anybody except Aur and Jog. I have some respect for Mandar Jog due to the very interesting work he did when he was in Ann Graybiel's lab, but I see no evidence that this particular work has garnered any attention except from the people who are doing it. [[User:Looie496|Looie496]] ([[User talk:Looie496|talk]]) 18:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Additionally, there are many 'pieces of work' that can be referenced, their published papers in peer reviewed journals and the IOS book as required (see [[WP:UNDUE|this fundamental policy]]). <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Goodwillein|Goodwillein]] ([[User talk:Goodwillein|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Goodwillein|contribs]]) 18:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->