Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Shakespeare authorship question/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Evidence presented by LessHeard vanU: since it is becoming a repeated allegation, here is some examples of NinaGreens violations of WP practice |
|||
Line 259:
As has been requested by NinaGreen on the workshop pages, I am exampling a few instances of her failure to abide by [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines]]. I would note that this is generally for her benefit, since nearly all parties to this case and other observers - and certainly members of the Arbitration Committee - will be familiar with these protocols. I shall draw particular attention to specific points, and note examples of NinaGreen's non observance to it.<br>
*[[Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#How_to_use_article_talk_pages|Stay objective]]; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=406917989 Apparently, there is a "controversy" over the authorship of the Shakespeare canon.]<br>
*[[Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Good_practices|Comment on content, not the contributor]] (per [[WP:NPA]]); [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Shakespeare_authorship_question&diff=prev&oldid=405979186 Alleging WP:OWNership of other pages by editor also participating on Talk:SAQ].<br>
*'''Be concise'''; [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=NinaGreen Take your pick of any half a dozen...]<br>
*[[Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable|When describing other people's contributions or edits, use diffs]]; Unable to supply an example of NinaGreen specifically not using a diff, but also unable to supply an example of one being used.<br>
| |||