Revision as of 06:35, 9 February 2011 edit Sergey shandar (talk \| contribs) 449 edits →Aikido (programming language) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:47, 11 February 2011 edit undo Aaron Brenneman (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 19,683 edits →Aikido (programming language): zero evidence in the article that this satisfies the general notability guideline Next edit →
Line 7: <small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 20:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)</small> '''Keep''' Looks like a good contribution to programming language theory and history. No arguments were given why the language is obscure. --[[User:Sergey shandar\|Sergey Shandar]] ([[User talk:Sergey shandar\|talk]]) 06:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC) * '''Woefully uninformed comment''' - There is zero evidence in the article that this satisfies the [[WP:N\|general notability]] guideline. And @Sergey Shandar, the burden of proof is on <u>the person who claims</u> it's notable, not the other way around. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman\|Aaron Brenneman]] ([[User talk:Aaron Brenneman\|talk]]) 12:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aikido (programming language): Difference between revisions