Content deleted Content added
Line 87:
Also the color scheme is conveying message red is bad, green is good. Which is fine if you working in marketing, but this is suppose to be subjective comparison, using emotional colors to depose someone to accept your conclusion is logical fallacy(see glitter generality). Actually I am going to remove the colors, I just proved why to remove them. No arguing, prove your point. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/208.102.251.122|208.102.251.122]] ([[User talk:208.102.251.122|talk]]) 16:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Does Java feature unsigned integers? no. Does C# feature unsigned integers? yes. Are they relevant/useful? Yes, for some types of applications like: 1) low level applications binding to native APIs which use unsigned integers/longs or 2) bit/byte processing of streams. Operations such as shift/rotate become more consistent and less prone for errors when they can be manipulated in their raw (unsigned) form. Should the topic be discussed at all in this article? Join the discussion at the bottom of this page, please. [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 23:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
::Hmmm... I believe that neither C# nor Java has bit-rotation operators. And Java has a separate "unsigned shift" operator to get around this issue. That's the problem of making such a simplistic comparison on a feature-by-feature basis. [[User:Spockwithabeard|Spockwithabeard]] ([[User talk:Spockwithabeard|talk]]) 18:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
You completely missed the point, java left out unsigned integers by design. http://www.gotw.ca/publications/c_family_interview.htm . The might add it in the future, but you cannot go out saying it doesn't have X , and act like it is negative when they pulled it out for a reason, not that they couldn't have unsigned integers.
| |||