Talk:Factor (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:55, 9 January 2011

Revision as of 19:03, 13 February 2011

Line 26:

::Don't get me wrong: the technology behind Factor and its VM are impressive technological achievements. Still, I found it hard to find articles on Factor that were not written by either [[Slava Pestov]], [http://phildawes.net/blog/ Phil Dawes], or [http://useless-factor.blogspot.com/ Daniel Ehrenberg], who in my eyes are too close to Factor to be considered secondary sources.

::Anyway, as I wrote above I am now convinced that Factor is notable. I won't revert if anybody removes the notability tag from the article again. — [[User:Tobias Bergemann|Tobias Bergemann]] ([[User talk:Tobias Bergemann|talk]]) 07:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

It appears that the Factor article has been declared non-notable again. I don't understand why this is. There have not been more secondary sources on Factor, but there are now peer-reviewed academic publications on Factor in addition to the secondary mentions that have already existed. How has Factor become less notable in this time? <small>[[User:LittleDan|LittleDan]]</small>^{[[User talk:LittleDan|talk]]} 19:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

==Interpreted language?==