Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ubernostrum (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Throwaway85 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9:
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. Author could pretty much use his own userspace for this matter. There are lots of non-notable programming languages that appear every month. Some get fluctuating between low amount of users who keep using it from time to time. Definitely fails to meet guidelines to be kept as an article. [[User:Userpd|Userpd]] ([[User talk:Userpd|talk]]) 14:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
'''Keep''' because nothing good ever came of a deletion spree. [[User:Ubernostrum|Ubernostrum]] ([[User talk:Ubernostrum|talk]]) 03:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
'''Keep''', per my reasoning [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/XMLmosaic&action=historysubmit&diff=413815239&oldid=413775057 here] [[User:Throwaway85|Throwaway85]] ([[User talk:Throwaway85|talk]]) 04:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||