Revision as of 23:42, 14 February 2011 edit Unscintillating (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,833 edits Keep ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:48, 14 February 2011 edit undo Ttonyb1 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 81,280 edits Comment Next edit →
Line 14: *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra\|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra\|(talk)]] 00:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)</small> '''Keep'''  Being an "obscure programming language" is a "keep" reason in a paperless encyclopedia.  There is a preliminary presumption of notability here when Google generates 50,000 hits.  In glancing at those hits, I saw many web pages with "afnix" in the URL, each of these web pages documents that "afnix" has been noticed.  [[User:Unscintillating\|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating\|talk]]) 23:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC) :'''Comment''' – Obscurity is not a reason to keep anything in an encyclopedia where notability is based on [[WP:V\| verifiability]]. Far from 50K GHits is a total of 418 GHits, none of which appear contain any substance that would support Wikipedia defined notability. [[User:Ttonyb1\|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top\|talk]]) 23:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language): Difference between revisions