Revision as of 23:48, 14 February 2011 edit Ttonyb1 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 81,280 edits Comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:18, 15 February 2011 edit undo Unscintillating (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,833 edits →Afnix (programming language): reply Next edit →
Line 15: '''Keep'''  Being an "obscure programming language" is a "keep" reason in a paperless encyclopedia.  There is a preliminary presumption of notability here when Google generates 50,000 hits.  In glancing at those hits, I saw many web pages with "afnix" in the URL, each of these web pages documents that "afnix" has been noticed.  [[User:Unscintillating\|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating\|talk]]) 23:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC) :'''Comment''' – Obscurity is not a reason to keep anything in an encyclopedia where notability is based on [[WP:V\| verifiability]]. Far from 50K GHits is a total of 418 GHits, none of which appear contain any substance that would support Wikipedia defined notability. [[User:Ttonyb1\|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top\|talk]]) 23:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC) ::Then you agree that the nominator's statement "obscure programming language" was not based on notability principles.  I clicked to page 42 and verify that the 56,500 Google hits changes to 418 Google hits.  How did you decide that none of the 418 hits were substantive?  [[User:Unscintillating\|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating\|talk]]) 00:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language): Difference between revisions