Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Comment |
|||
Line 16:
:'''Comment''' – Obscurity is not a reason to keep anything in an encyclopedia where notability is based on [[WP:V| verifiability]]. Far from 50K GHits is a total of 418 GHits, none of which appear contain any substance that would support Wikipedia defined notability. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 23:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
::Then you agree that the nominator's statement "obscure programming language" was not based on notability principles. I clicked to page 42 and verify that the 56,500 Google hits changes to 418 Google hits. How did you decide that none of the 418 hits were substantive? [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 00:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
:::'''Comment''' – As I stated above, the article subject lacks Ghits and GNEWs of substance and the article provides no independent reliable sources to support claims of notability. The number of Ghits is really not that hard to review if one gets past the "index of/XXX", "downloads", and other items such as "List of Programming Languages", etc. If I have missed something feel free to add it to the article and notify the AfD participants. Unfortunately, no one has added any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to the article in the time the AfD has been active. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 00:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||