Revision as of 02:40, 15 February 2011 edit Ttonyb1 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 81,280 edits Copyedit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:04, 15 February 2011 edit undo Unscintillating (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,833 edits →Afnix (programming language): reply Next edit →
Line 21: ::::Did this happen before this nomination?  Have all of the major contributors been notified?  Where we are now, we really don't know what would have happened had "communal consensus" been followed.  [[User:Unscintillating\|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating\|talk]]) 02:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC) :::::*'''Comment''' – Golly, thanks for the lesson in the use and purpose of AfDs. Feel free to forward this to the nominator. As I stated above, the article subject lacks Ghits and GNEWs of substance and the article provides no independent reliable sources to support claims of notability. All you have to do to help the article survive the AfD is add [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]]. [[User:Ttonyb1\|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top\|talk]]) 02:37, 15 February 2011 (UTC) :::::::How is saying "All you have to do" anything other than using AfD as a battering ram? [[User:Unscintillating\|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating\|talk]]) 04:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language): Difference between revisions