Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
d |
Throwaway85 (talk | contribs) →Y (programming language): adding source |
||
Line 10:
'''Keep''', deleting information en masse is never a good idea. If the article really shouldn't be here, I'm sure someone else will nom it. CM should probably chill out on the spree. [[User:Throwaway85|Throwaway85]] ([[User talk:Throwaway85|talk]]) 05:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
::Also, authorative sources exist. 02:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
'''Keep''', esp. as it relates to peephole optimization, and has a historical context within that purpose. It would make sense to incorporate it within the peephole optimization article with a redirect leading to that, but I do not have the time to do the editing atm. Until someone does, it should be a keep. [[User:Nodekeeper|Nodekeeper]] ([[User talk:Nodekeeper|talk]]) 06:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Line 20 ⟶ 21:
*'''Delete''' No demonstrated notability or outside sources. Also at least 2 of the 3 keeps are simply "keep because deletion in general is bad."--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 01:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
*'''Source:''' Dedicated paper on Y published by ACM. Authoritative, peer-reviewed, independent source, in addition to the source included in the article, satisfies WP:N. [http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/960000/954278/p59-hanson.pdf?key1=954278&key2=1771197921&coll=DL&dl=ACM&ip=142.104.100.41&CFID=10338695&CFTOKEN=87309019 The paper.] [[User:Throwaway85|Throwaway85]] ([[User talk:Throwaway85|talk]]) 02:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||