Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Copyedit |
Copyedit |
||
Line 30:
*'''Delete''' per the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Afnix+%28programming+language%29%22 lack] of significant coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. The sole result is a copy of the Wikipedia article. A [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Afnix%22+programming&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 Google Scholar search] and a [http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Afnix+(programming+language)%22#sclient=psy&hl=en&tbs=bks:1&q=%22Afnix%22+programming Google Books search] return no significant coverage. I note that the article is unsourced: The core policy [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] mandates deletion. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 22:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' [[WP:V]], [[WP:RS]], and [[WP:BURDEN]] are '''content''' policies. If someone challenges that content in the article is sourced, they might put <nowiki>{{cn}}</nowiki> templates on such content, and following policy there would be a time to delete that content. WP:V adds, "But in practice not everything need actually be attributed." This AfD discussion is not about the content of this article, but whether the topic is '''notable''', [[WP:N]]. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 23:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' – Let's try this once more, the article is nominated for deletion because it lacks independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to support claims of [[WP:N|notability]]. There is only one way to provide notability for this article – provide independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. There is nothing that supports Wikipedia defined [[WP:N|notability]] for this article. No one expects everything to be supported, but there are '''no''' (zero) independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to support '''any''' claims of [[WP:N|notability]] for this article. If there are independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] they need to be added to the article in order for it to survive the AfD. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 01:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||