Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cybercobra (talk | contribs) m +unsigned |
Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) Closing debate, result was delete |
||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. The arguments put forward by those favouring deletion (that the article lacks [[WP:GNG|sufficent coverage]] in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to indicate [[WP:notability|notability]]) have not been effectively refuted by those in favor of keeping it. If such sources can be found, please let me know, and I will consider restoring the article. -- '''''[[User:Lear's Fool|Lear's]] [[User Talk:Lear's Fool|Fool]]''''' 02:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
===[[Afnix (programming language)]]===
:{{la|Afnix (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afnix (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 February 12#{{anchorencode:Afnix (programming language)}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
Line 11 ⟶ 17:
:::*'''Comment''' – You or anyone has the ability to do so. In addition the author has been notified and has the [[WP:BURDEN|burden]] of providing support for the article. If this does not happen in 7 days after the creation of the AfD the article will most likely be deleted. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 15:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 00:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)</small>
'''Keep''' Being an "obscure programming language" is a "keep" reason in a paperless encyclopedia. There is a preliminary presumption of notability here when Google generates 50,000 hits. In glancing at those hits, I saw many web pages with "afnix" in the URL, each of these web pages documents that "afnix" has been noticed. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 23:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Line 31 ⟶ 37:
*'''Comment''' [[WP:V]], [[WP:RS]], and [[WP:BURDEN]] are '''content''' policies. If someone challenges that content in the article is sourced, they might put <nowiki>{{cn}}</nowiki> templates on such content, and following policy there would be a time to delete that content. WP:V adds, "But in practice not everything need actually be attributed." This AfD discussion is not about the content of this article, but whether the topic is '''notable''', [[WP:N]]. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 23:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' – Let's try this once more, the article is nominated for deletion because it lacks independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to support claims of [[WP:N|notability]]. There is only one way to provide notability for this article – provide independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. There is nothing that supports Wikipedia defined [[WP:N|notability]] for this article. No one expects everything to be supported, but there are '''no''' (zero) independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to support '''any''' claims of [[WP:N|notability]] for this article. If there are independent, [[WP:V|verifiable]], [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] they need to be added to the article in order for it to survive the AfD. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 01:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||