Content deleted Content added
reply to Tiresais |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19:
Should the Multiplier-Accelerator effect be included in this or is it under a different name and I'm too tired to see it?--[[User:Tiresais|Tiresais]] 14:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
:They have their own articles: [[Accelerator effect]] and [[Multiplier (economics)]]. Not sure how much overlap there is right now. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] <sup>[[user talk:rd232|talk]]</sup> 00:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
==Obscurity==
I'd say this article is cluttered. In one sense, from the terse descriptions of each school of thought listed in what seems like no particular order, and in another, its willingness to concede those terms outlining causality (e.g. full employment-- extraneous technical terms) which are, within Wikipedia, obscure. For example, it attempts to explain how fluctuation may be linked to [[full employment]] without defining what full employment might mean in each specific case. Speaking as a layman, it is difficult to follow, and it reads POV to me as well. [[User:Bordello|Bordello]] 10:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
| |||