Talk:Tropical cyclone forecast model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
This page doesnt have anything to do with climate change
Expansion. Feedback is needed.
Line 3:
{{dyktalk|23 February|2006|entry=...that until the late [[1980s]], the most accurate '''[[tropical cyclone prediction model]]''' was purely [[statistics|statistical]]?}}
 
=Topics from 2006=
== Expansion todo ==
 
Still need to finish adding model info from the 2005 Verification report and more details on each individual model. --[[User:AySz88|AySz88]][[User talk:AySz88|<font color="#FF9966">^</font>]][[Special:Contributions/AySz88|<font color="#FF6633">-</font>]][[User talk:AySz88|<font color="#FF3300">^</font>]] 05:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 
=Topics from 2007=
== Possible changes ==
 
Line 22 ⟶ 20:
:::Move complete. [[User:Wdwic Pictures|Wdwic Pictures]] 07:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 
=Topics from 2008=
==Added topic year headers==
''18-Aug-2008:'' I have added the headers "Topics from 2006" (etc.) as on other talk pages, to help keep the topics sorted by date, but fortunately this was a small talk-page, so I ''didn't'' need to move several topics into date order (other talk-pages have had topics scrambled across 6 years). -[[User:Wikid77|Wikid77]] ([[User talk:Wikid77|talk]]) 18:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Line 49 ⟶ 46:
 
Failing all that, a fallback would be a page giving links to each model, with the most accurate ones toward the top. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.166.203.170|68.166.203.170]] ([[User talk:68.166.203.170|talk]]) 14:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Long overdue expansion - input needed ==
Improvements to [[numerical weather prediction]], [[Atmospheric model]], and [[History of numerical weather prediction]] have led to some recent expansion within this article. We're reaching an impasse, however. The list format currently making up much of its body is not going to pass muster when this article is GANed, which could be sooner than you think. How should we proceed? I've added a history section, but we could just interweave history in with each piece of guidance, which would reduce redundancy. I need input before going further forward here. [[User:Thegreatdr|Thegreatdr]] ([[User talk:Thegreatdr|talk]]) 04:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)