Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure (programming language) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
forgot to sign |
||
Line 12:
*'''Delete''' I see no independent, in-depth treatment of this language from [[WP:RS]]. Would be willing to change my vote if some is found. [[User talk:Ravendrop|Ravendrop]] 07:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
**What beef do you have with the German article? --[[User:Cybercobra|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 08:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
:::Can you, or someone else, verify that it is a [[WP:RS]]. [[User talk:Ravendrop|Ravendrop]] 04:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per the references provided above (one refereed article + two independent mentions) and by being the successor to [[Q (equational programming language)]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 21:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep or WP:Buro''' Renomination churning of recent AfD closed with ten Keep !votes, one Delete !vote, cited references, and withdrawal of the nomination by the nominator. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 23:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
:*It's getting harder and harder to AGF with you. It has been pointed out to you multiple times that the previous AfD closed due to outside canvassing and harassment, something widely accepted. Argue keep for actual reasons, not this one.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 02:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
::*Comment: I have no knowledge of or interest in these rumors. I think that this nomination could have waited for three months. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 04:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
:::These are not rumours, they are fact. And that you don't know of them doesn't mean that you can ignore them or pretend they don't exist. See [[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT]]. Additionally, there is no policy that says that withdrawn Afds have to wait any time period before they can be re-nominated. It is perfectly acceptable to re-nominate them at any time afterwards. As of now you have not given any policy based reasons to keep this article. [[User talk:Ravendrop|Ravendrop]] 04:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||