Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure (programming language) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:37, 1 March 2011

Revision as of 08:37, 1 March 2011

Line 20:

:::These are not rumours, they are fact. And that you don't know of them doesn't mean that you can ignore them or pretend they don't exist. See [[WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT]]. Additionally, there is no policy that says that withdrawn Afds have to wait any time period before they can be re-nominated. It is perfectly acceptable to re-nominate them at any time afterwards. As of now you have not given any policy based reasons to keep this article. [[User talk:Ravendrop|Ravendrop]] 04:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

::::Sorry, I have no interest.  Whatever your issue is, it could have waited three months, there is no deadline at Wikipedia.  [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

:::::Alright, I'm can't AGF at this point, and just need to point out that Unscintillating is purposely playing the fool despite full knowledge of the Reddit canvassing incident.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 08:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)