Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Join Java: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
comment |
spa |
||
Line 7:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Cybercobra|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 03:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' There are 4 journal articles about it listed in the article's References. The third-party peer review involved in getting a journal article accepted+published makes these sufficiently independent for notability purposes, at least in my view. --[[User:Cybercobra|<b><font color="3773A5">Cyber</font></b><font color="FFB521">cobra</font>]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 03:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' There area also a number of derivative works referencing this work in google scholar. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/121.45.34.160|121.45.34.160]] ([[User talk:121.45.34.160|talk]]) 12:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{SPA|121.45.34.160}}
*'''Keep''' as above. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 21:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
*''Comment'' I want to say I have no real desire to have this article deleted. However, I need to point out that, given that the four references in the article are all written by it's creator, you're going to actually need to refer to at least one other source that can be considered reliable.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 08:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||