Content deleted Content added
GroovyGuzi (talk | contribs) m →Total rewrite in progress, November 2010: Case of serious vandalism. |
GroovyGuzi (talk | contribs) →Total rewrite in progress, November 2010: Reaction to Supyanhussin's edits |
||
Line 57:
Thanks to ClueBot NG for spotting serious case of vandalism by Supyanhussin and reverting to previous version [[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] ([[User talk:GroovyGuzi|talk]]) 12:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I’ve taken a close look at Supyanhussin’s changes to the article. Most of them date back to an older version. They are unacceptable for the following reasons:
(1) The changes represent an outdated view of CALL, predating the definition produced by Levy (1997).
(2) Levy’s broad definition of CALL is accepted by established professional CALL associations, notably CALICO and EUROCALL. Both associations accept conference papers and publish articles on the topics that Supyanhussin claims are outside the ambit of CALL. EUROCALL has SIGs dedicated to concordancing/corpora and to CMC.
(3) The changes damage the structure of the article as a whole.
(4) The changes make the introduction read like a polemic rather than part of an encyclopaedia article.
[[User:GroovyGuzi|GroovyGuzi]] ([[User talk:GroovyGuzi|talk]]) 15:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||