Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure (programming language) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) comment |
→Pure (programming language): 2 replies |
||
Line 31:
::::Sorry, I have no interest. Whatever your issue is, it could have waited three months, there is no deadline at Wikipedia. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 05:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
:::::Alright, I can't AGF at this point, and just need to point out that Unscintillating is purposely playing the fool despite full knowledge of the Reddit canvassing incident.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 08:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
::::::In spite of what this previous post might appear to be, respondent has no history of dispute with me and I can and do assume good faith going forward. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 00:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
:::::If you don't know, or don't care, about the circumstances of the previous AfD you should not have mentioned it. Yaksar is correct; you are not acting in good faith. You've only brought it up because you saw in it an opportunity for deliberate bad-faith obstructionism. [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 02:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
::::::To whom it may concern, this is respondent's previous response to me [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2006_rugby_union_handbag_controversy&diff=413441906&oldid=413437584 here]. Suggest that respondent use "IMO" more often. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 00:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||