Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pure (programming language) (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 36:
::::::To whom it may concern, this is respondent's previous response to me [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2006_rugby_union_handbag_controversy&diff=413441906&oldid=413437584 here]. Suggest that respondent use "IMO" more often. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 00:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
:::::::And? Your point? I said, "I agree with opinions X and Y" and you replied with "snigger snigger thanks for your opinions on opinions X and Y, but what are ''your'' opinions snigger snigger" as though it wasn't blatantly obvious that I shared those opinions. I don't like being talked down to, and called you on it. It's not a big deal, and irrelevant to this discussion. [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 01:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
:'''KEEP''' Based on the reasons I gave only a week or two ago. Pure is a language which has a number of developers, an active mailing list, peer reviewed articles describing it. The are distributions for many Linux systems - none to my knowledge produced by the main developer, but others consider the language sufficiently important. Can anyone point out one possible benefit of removing the article? Would Wikipedia be better without this article? Of course not. I'm not a user of the language, but realise it is an important language. Any idiot can hook up lex and yacc and make their own language, but Pure is well thought out. [[User:Drkirkby|Drkirkby]] ([[User talk:Drkirkby|talk]]) 23:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||