Content deleted Content added
→NOT Encycolpedic: new section |
|||
Line 37:
:: For the record, I removed the ''-ed'', not because it can be called "incorrect" so much as "deprecated by those in the industry". Which is more or less what [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Numerical_control&diff=383559720&oldid=382868802 this diff] was also getting at (preferred usage), plus or minus the notion of "correct". — [[User:Three-quarter-ten|¾-10]] 23:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
== NOT Encycolpedic ==
"Enter MIT
This was not an impossible problem to solve, but would require some sort of feedback system, like a selsyn, to directly measure how far the controls had actually turned. Faced with the daunting task of building such a system, "
There is no way things like this would be accepted in a acceptable encyclopedia. This article needs a MAJOR rewrite.
--[[Special:Contributions/69.123.205.100|69.123.205.100]] ([[User talk:69.123.205.100|talk]]) 17:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||