Content deleted Content added
→NOT Encycolpedic: new section |
|||
Line 46:
--[[Special:Contributions/69.123.205.100|69.123.205.100]] ([[User talk:69.123.205.100|talk]]) 17:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
: But why? I guess you mean that [[WP:NPOV]] extends so far as not calling a task daunting. If that's basically what you mean, I think you're misinterpreting the NPOV concept. The article isn't "biased against" the task of incorporating a feedback loop (not calling it harder than it really was). It's just acknowledging the reality (the malice of inanimate objects, as [[M. R. James]] might have called it). If you removed this way of phrasing, the next problem you would have is that the average reader would have no concept of whether a small problem or a large problem was being faced (being naturally unknowledgeable about the topic). In other words, how else would we succinctly convey that this was a "major surgery" problem as opposed to a "band-aid" problem? — [[User:Three-quarter-ten|¾-10]] 01:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
| |||