Talk:Neural coding: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 33:
It's clear that the consensus supports this merge, and I apologize for being such a slowpoke, but I'll get around to it soon. Per the discussion below, I've added [[NeuroElectroDynamics]] to the proposed merger, but it should end up being no more than about one sentence here. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 15:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 
'''Argument against a merger with [[Sparse coding]]''': sparse coding and its derivatives (unsupervised learning of sparse representations) have become important in [[Machine learning|machine learning]], outside of the context of neural coding and the associated biological analogies. Examples of papers in that area include (Teh, Welling, Hinton & Osindero 2003, JMLR), (Lee, Battle, Raina & Ng, NIPS'2006), (Ranzato, Poultney & LeCun, NIPS'2006), (Elard & Aharon 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Proc.), (Ranzato, Boureau & LeCun, NIPS'2007), (Grosse, Raina, Kwong & Ng, UAI 2007), (Kavukcuoglu, Ranzato & LeCun 2008, tech. rep.), (Lee, Ekanadham & Ng, NIPS 2007), (Bradley & Bagnell, NIPS'2008), David Bradley's PhD thesis (2009).{{unsigned2|00:48, 26 March 2011|Yoshua.Bengio}}
 
== Removing new NeuroElectroDynamics section ==